Devil’s Contract:
The History of the Faustian Bargain
By Ed Simon (Melville House Publishing)
The book describes itself as being about the Faustian bargain, but it is broader than that, dealing with any deal with the Devil, real or metaphoric.
It starts with the religious basis of such deals, as is found in the Abrahamic texts and their apocrypha, then describes the quasi-historical story of Faust, including detailed sketches on his major literary interpreters: Marlowe, Goethe, and Mann. Discussing the tradition of soul-selling artists, the book then considers more metaphorical Faustian deals in our modern world, going so far as to suggest that we are exiting the Anthropocene for the Faustocene, a period of history not about our control over the world but about our unease with that control and what payment it might extract.
There is a section late in the book where the author makes a rejoinder to Adorno’s statement that no poetry can exist after Auschwitz to suggest that poetry is all there is after the first successful nuclear weapons test. And that feels true to form as regards this book, which at points feels more like poetry, an extended riff on the idea of what it means for evil to have a personage, or even an anthology of essays.
I did particularly like the sections on the underlying history of how we get to Faust. The idea of the Faustocene is fun. There were a few sections like that on the ways that these ideas intersect with the Gnostic traditions or likewise with the traditions around the Blues, that felt to short. And there were points where it felt like too much triangulation around a topic, or textual meanders, showing up since the concept itself is so broad.
I was unaware that the author was a religion writer. It feels embarrassingly self-obvious not to think about how a book about the Devil would involve religious thought. I think that this serves the text, but I do think that a reader should be aware of it in the sense that I feel like some of the sections are much more rewarding with a working knowledge of Christianity, and it might change how you appreciate the book.
It is an inconsistent book, not in quality but in topicality, moving in a sort of stream of consciousness through various representations of the Devil and their works. Its expansive reach means that I feel that the reader will matter here more than usual, because of how many different things that the book is. That makes it hard to recommend, or at least go into it thinking that you will love parts and be left out by others, and that it is less historical or lit crit than conceptual and experiential.
It may be the first time that I wished a book was a video essay, in that serialization and visual editing would provide more architecture to the text, and the rambling nature fit spoken language more.
My thanks to the author, Ed Simon, for writing the book, and to the publisher, Melville House, for making the ARC available to me.
CITATION HEEDED 